Compositional Analysis
of Kobashi Essential Oils

click here or photos to see chromatogram

Scott At GC-Ms

Mass Spectrum
HP MS 5972 quadrapole detector,
GC 5890 and Auto Sampler

The main analysis on each oil is carried out using gas-chromatography / mass-spectroscopy (GC-MS).<br> This type of analysis gives information about the individual components of each oil, and their relative amounts. See below for more information.

The physical properties of each oil are also tested to ensure that they are within the expected range for each oil (e.g., density).

GC-MS Analysis

Component identification

The different components of each oil are identified using the following databases;

1.) Comparison of the GC retention time with a retention time library.
a) Comparison of the mass spectrum with the Wiley275.L, Wiley7n.L, and HPCH1607.L mass spectra librarys, containing over 360 000 entries.


) Comparison with pure ‘standards’ for certain- components, especially unwanted contaminants such as phthalates.

2.) Cross-referencing with other oils.

3.) Comparison with published data on each essential oil
4.) Analysis run on quantified library of pesticides to PPT accuracy.

ppm = parts per million

1 ppm = 1/1,000,000 = 0.000001 = 0.0001%
10 ppm = 10/1,000,000 = 0.00001 = 0.001%
100 ppm = 100/1,000,000 = 0.0001 = 0.01%
200 ppm = 200/1,000,000 = 0.0002 = 0.02%
400 ppm = 200/1,000,000 = 0.0002 = 0.04%
1000 ppm = 5000/1,000,000 = 0.005 = 0.1%
2000 ppm = 5000/1,000,000 = 0.005 = 0.2%
10,000 ppm = 10000/1,000,000 = 0.01 = 1.0%
20,000 ppm = 20000/1,000,000 = 0.02 = 2.0%


ppm = parts per million

grams/milliliter = g/ml = milligrams/microliter = mg/ul
1ug /ml = 1mg/l = 1ppm
ppm = ug/g =ug/ml = ng/mg = pg/ug = 10 -6
ppm = mg/litres of water

1 g / 1000ml = 1000 ppm
PPB = Parts per billion = ng/g = ng/ml = pg/mg = 10 -9



<a title="Click here to better understanding essential oils." href="../exercise1.shtml">understanding essential oils.</a>>/td>

Written by

Written By Dr. Kevin Brigden
and Scott Ballard


A number of different components can have the same retention time. Similarly, the mass spectra of many components of essential oils are very similar. Using the multiple comparison approach outlined above helps to avoid misidentification that can occur when only one type of library is used. There are numerous examples of erroneous information within published oil composition data where only one type of library was used.

Percent composition

The percent composition figures quoted for each component of an oil are obtained from the mass spectrum detector. There are a number of different types of detector that are commonly used, and they all have slightly difference response factors to a particular component. The percentage figures quoted for each component may vary slightly from those obtained using, for example, a flame-ionisation detector (FID).

Mass spectrum detectors are far more accurate than an FID for component identification, which is why Kobashi use this type of detector for our primary analysis. We are currently analysing all our oils using a FID detector, in addition to the GCMS data we already have. In this way, we will be able to compare the composition of our oils with reported data from either type of detector to a very high degree of accuracy.

Kobashi testing "This means that you do not need to buy organic oils"

The reality is much more complex than this statement.

We try to buy as much organically certified as possible. This does not mean they are free of herbicides or pesticides, but if we find them the oils will be rejected and the suppliers will be notified.

I will say you are misleading yourself if you think a stamp on a product is 100% Organic just because it says organic. Most Organic Organizations to not test the end product for pesticide or herbicide residual, in fact I do not know any that do. It is just a paper trail based on trust.

There are many reason for herbicide and pesticide residual. They have even been found in the ice at the poles.

We are not able to assure that these nasty chemicals are not in products at trace parts per trillion for every known chemical. We do our best by testing to find what we can. I do not believe anyone can guarantee they are not present 100% and it would be misleading to say so.

best regards,

Scott

Analysis

Picture of Melissa upclose
Melissa Analysis
Click here for Hyssop Oil Analysis
Hyssop Analysis
Click here for Lemon Oil Analysis
Lemon Analysis
Click here for Thyme oil Analysis
Thyme Oil Analysis

Ravensara vs Ravintsara Analysis
to lavender analysis
Lavender Analysis
Frankincense analyisisClarysage analyisisHelchrysum-gymnocephalem analyisisHelchrysum-italicum analyisisMyrtle Moroccan

Neroli Tunisian

Oregano Bulgarian

Chamomile Wild analyisis

Get Free Acrobat reader 6

Beyond the Call of Duty
For all our oils:
the analysis is continued far beyond the last component that is expected in the oil. This enables us to check for unexpected components in the oil, be they indigenous to the oil, adulterants that have been added, or unwanted contaminants such as phthalates.
Beyond the Call of Duty
The analysis of essential oils is often carried out without this type of extended run-time analysis in order to save time and money. As such, certain components that are present in the oil may be missed.

Additional Testing

1) Phthalate analysis.
Some essential oils have been found to contain compounds called phthalates. These compounds are present either as trace contaminants, or in some cases intentionally added to bulk-out the oils and aid volatilisation.

There is considerable concern as to the safety of these compounds (see the www.greenpeace.org website for further details).

As such, one of the analyses that we carry out on our oils is to look for any phthalate present in the oil using a pseudo-SIM method which is extremely sensitive to these compounds (as low as 2 parts per million).

2) Head-space (Volatiles) analysis

This type of analysis involves warming the oil and analysing the vapour that is released. Once again, the analysis is carried out using GC-MS. This method gives information about the most volatile components (or top notes) of an essential oil, some of which may be too volatile to be analysed accurately using ‘normal’ GCMS. This method is also particularly useful for the identification of solvent residues in the oil, such as benzene, ethanol, ethyl acetate, hexane or pentane.
Standard Analysis GC Details

GC 5890 system
Oil solution; 50 ul of oil in 2ml pentane
(acetone to clear if necessary)
Injection volume; 1ul, splitless
Column type; HP5-ms low bleed, 59.23m,0.22mmID,
0.25um film thickness
Carrier gas; Helium
Flow rate; 1ml/min , 25.9cm/sec
Pressure; 186
Inlet temp. oil dependent
Detector temp. 280 degrees Centigrade.

Better understanding essential oils.

kobashi.co.uk/Chamomiles_Chamomile_Blue_German_Chamomile_Wild

kobashi.co.uk/Lavender_pure_essential_oil_Lavandula_officinalis

kobashi.co.uk/Helichrysum_pure_essential_oil_gymnocephalum_italicum

essential-oil-logo.gif
essential-oil-logo.gif

1985 © 2012 - Kobashi Essential Oils for Authentic Aromatherapy